Abstract

For four or five decades, science educators, including physics educators, have benefited from the work of Piaget and neo-Piagetians. Piaget’s theory of cognitive development argues that children move through four different stages of mental development, how they acquire knowledge and the role of active learning. Among other issues, neo-Piagetians considered that working memory capacity is affected by biological maturation, restricting young children’s ability to acquire complex thinking and reasoning skills. I want to emphasise that these educational developments largely benefitted science teachers and young science learners with many new and improved science curricula and teaching methods. However, challenges to these views arose when educational researchers observed children’s learning that did not neatly fit these cognitive stages or restrictions. Since the mid 1990’s, there has been a growing body of research demonstrating that, with appropriate scaffolding by teachers and opportunities for student collaboration, young learners can engage with and understand abstract scientific concepts that might otherwise be seen to be out of reach for this age group. Based on this premise from recent research in educational psychology, the work of the Einstein-First group has embarked on studies that demonstrate how young learners from primary school onwards can engage and learn abstract Einsteinian physics concepts that were previously considered best taught only in upper high school.

Highlights

  • For four or five decades, science educators, including physics educators, have benefited from the work of Piaget and neo-Piagetians

  • Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia; d.treagust@curtin.edu.au † Presented at the 1st Electronic Conference on Universe, 22–28 February 2021; Available online: https://ecu2021.sciforum.net/

  • Neo-Piagetians considered that working memory capacity is affected by biological maturation, restricting young children’s ability to acquire complex thinking and reasoning skills

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For four or five decades, science educators, including physics educators, have benefited from the work of Piaget and neo-Piagetians. Scientific Concepts within Reach of Young Learners: Support from the Educational Research Literature †

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.