Abstract

ABSTRACT Arguments in Science & Technology Studies for public participation in decision-making regarding science and technology and for responsible innovation have not adequately addressed the obstacles posed by the economic relations of the market. This paper argues that participation and responsibility are incompatible with the uncontrolled dynamics of the market and with what Gerald Doppelt calls the ‘Lockean code’ of private ownership of the means of production. Responsible innovation aims, in part, to facilitate the expression of what Anthony Giddens terms ‘life politics.’ Without challenging the mediation of the relationship between science, technology, and society by the market, arguments for participatory science and technology and responsible innovation remain within the political framework of Giddens’ Third Way. This paper makes the case for looking beyond Third Way politics toward socialist democratic planning as the future for participatory and responsible innovation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call