Abstract
The study focuses on the relationship between process skills and critical thinking in junior high school students in learning science. Besides, an interrelation between process skill and critical thinking skills was also investigated. The study used a mixed-method. A sample of this study is 689 students of total sampling technique. Quantitative data were analyzed by SPSS 21 to find descriptive statistics in terms of mean, min, max while qualitative were analyzed in-depth interviews. The finding shows that the science process skill of students in learning science whether urban and rural areas are good categories. The independent sample t-test shows that students’ science process skills in learning science in urban tend to be higher than in rural schools (p<0.01). Students’ critical thinking in learning science for urban areas is high but for rural areas is a fair category, with significance p<0.001. The regression showed the level of contribution of students’ science process skill influence as much as 51.5% for critical thinking. The other research result was found that students’ science process skill affects critical thinking in learning science. Moreover, a comparison between students’ science process skills and critical thinking based on their school location showed that urban is higher than rural.
Highlights
Critical thinking becomes a pattern of thinking that must be possessed by learners
The novelty of this study explores the science processing skills and critical thinking of students’ junior high schools, to know the difference between the skill process skills and critical thinking in urban and rural areas
The result of students’ basic and integration science process skills in science subject of fluid in urban and rural junior high schools showed by table 3
Summary
Critical thinking becomes a pattern of thinking that must be possessed by learners. Critical thinking is the use of cognitive skills to improve learning outcomes, such as: to analyze thoughts, arguments, solve problems carefully (Saputra & Kuswanto, 2019). It is expected that students can think about the ideal. Students can solve problems and phenomena in their activities in social life (Akcay & Yager, 2016; Tiruneh & Cock, 2017). Critical thinking has five indicators, namely: providing simple explanations, building basic skills, making conclusions, making further explanations, and setting strategies and tactics (Aminudin et al, 2019).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.