Science or Research [Associate Editor's View

Abstract

It is argued that 'science' and 'research' are terms that are often seen as synonyms. Yet there is a clear difference. Science explains the existing world by means of models, preferably in mathematical formalisms. On the other hand, research opens new applications. Confusing the true nature of science and research creates false expectations. Formerly, science and education were a sole university task. Large (industrial) institutions addressed the research challenges. About 90% of the papers in typical research conferences, like the IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), came from industry. Today, the majority of industrial research institutions has disappeared. This research task is given to universities, and industry papers now make up one-third of ISSCC accepted papers. During these conferences, academic researchers happily show their latest results but often lack fundamental scientific understanding. In some top-10 universities, an accepted research paper on a tier 1 conference is essential for obtaining a Ph.D. degree. That is a huge misunderstanding about the essence of science. A scientist must be able to build knowledge by showing that he/she can investigate and explain the world in a scientific way. Coming up with a novel idea qualifies you as a good researcher, but it is not relevant for qualifying you as a scientist. The research task is tempting to universities as it comes with fame and funding. This evolution has thoroughly corrupted the scientific education of university dwellers. Still, scientists have to provide new insights in understanding nature because that is the basis for research progress.