Abstract

In the twenty-first century, the rise and support of fascism-related views threaten freedom of speech, freedom of sexual orientation, religious tolerance and progressive agendas that advocate equity. We argue that mainstream science education generally does not, but should, educate students against fascism-related views—such as racism, sexism, homophobia and religious intolerance—with a view to strengthening mutual respect and the common good. We argue some science teaching practices are found to be suitable to fascism-like ideologies (e.g. race in genetics teaching), and that the use of the concept of ‘scientific literacy’ has focused on neoliberal possessive individualism. As a consequence, mainstream science education overlooks the development of sympathy, altruism and interpersonal skills. We also discuss the activity of science education in authoritarian, undemocratic regimes in history, showing that fascist regimes have long used ‘apolitical’ scientists’ achievements to establish and expand regimes’ intolerant and violent ideologies. We use that historical relationship to argue fascism is science education’s business. Given the fear that current political discourses in many countries are again swinging towards fascism, we outline potential pathways for science education which focus on the social and emotional development of students. We argue that to develop a pedagogy for democracy, that attends to equity and social justice, it is imperative it enables pupils to develop at a psychological level with diverse others, including through their own agency. This pedagogy builds on critical pedagogies.

Highlights

  • Should science education deliberately and clearly stand against authoritarian, intolerant, oppressive, misogynist, and racist views, promoted and valued by fascist ideologies? In this article, we contend that developing tolerant and empathetic views, the values of democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of gender identity, freedom of religion and of an inclusive society must be built collaboratively across all school subjects

  • Dave Renton (1999) has documented that in the twenty-year period after the end of WWII there was strong opposition to fascist political movements in Europe but, from the seventies, pockets of fascism resurged on the continent, including within countries severely adversely affected by the ideologies of the war, such as Italy, France and the UK

  • We argue that not recognising the rise of fascism as a socio-scientific issue which must be openly addressed in classrooms leaves mainstream science education not recognising such a threat to democracy and inclusive societies

Read more

Summary

Contributions from critical pedagogy

More than educating the individual to be critical consumers, critical pedagogy seeks to build a “much more politicised and issues-based science education” (Hodson 1998, p. 2). Mainstream science education will do very little to tackle fascist-related views if it ignores developments in critical pedagogy such as those above and continues to teach science for the sake of scientific knowledge only, detached from its sociohistorical connections to social injustices. This said, current developments on social justice focus mainly on the sociological level of transformation but curricula and teaching practice in Western societies still disconnect learners from love (Bazzul and Tolbert 2019), compassion, empathy, and other bonding feelings (Magee and Pherali 2019). The emotional and psychological level needs to be brought into focus for a deeper change to occur, and in order to do this we turn to look at Othering and social justice in order to show why the emotional level is so important

Considerations about othering and social justice
Science as a social activity
Combining social responsiveness with science education
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call