Abstract

This volume contains historical studies of several sciences as practiced at Harvard University. Two of these studies have relevance to the history of archaeology. A chapter by Toby Appel focuses upon the scientific career of Jeffries Wyman, first curator of Harvard's Peabody Museum. She contrasts Wyman's unassuming character with the dominating personality of his mentor and contemporary Louis Agassiz. Trained as a medical doctor, Wyman's main love was zoology, particularly comparative anatomy. In his mid-40s, he encountered his first shell midden and was bitten by the archaeology bug. Soon he was doing pioneering excavation in both New England and Florida. In 1866, he was selected to be the curator of the Peabody Museum, primarily upon his strong museum background but also because of the high regard with which he was held by certain influential people. His selection to this position may have made him America's first professional archaeologist. His principal responsibilities were to collect and display archaeological and ethnological specimens and he made great steps in this direction prior to his death in 1874. Wyman's scientific work was poorly known or studied (he is best noted for having made the first scientific description of the gorilla), in part, Appel argues, because he did not seek acclaim or controversy. His greatest influence was locally through personal interactions with students and colleagues. His archaeological work is only briefly discussed in this and the following article, and there is still much to be written about this man of high character.

Highlights

  • A chapter by Toby Appel focuses upon the scientific career of Jeffries Wyman, fIfst c rator of Harvard's Peabody Museum

  • Some of the other chapters in this volume deal with or at least mention other questions that are quite relevant to the institutional history of archaeology in this century

  • We all know the departments where a high proportion of faculty were trained in the same deparunent. This phenomenon has both positive and negative effects on the discipline, but either way, it is a topic in need of serious study. Another issue, which has been of particular relevance in the history of Harvard. is that the varying emphasis placed upon applied vs. pure science

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1881-1950 199 1 edited by Roy Blankenship, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anthropology Publication in Anthropology 4, Philadelphia (known primarily for his ethnographic work, and did some archaeology on the Eastern Seaboard of the United States). 1 990 in New Directions in Archaeology, edited by Margaret W. Science at Harvard University: Historical Perspectives, edited by Clark A. This volume contains historical studies of several sciences as practiced at Harvard University.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call