Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper studies whether the centralization of public school finance affects school revenue levels. The theoretical framework indicates that centralization has price and income effects on the pivotal voter’s demand for school revenue, but the overall effect is ambiguous. A public school finance reform in Michigan (U.S. state), which centralized its school finance system by restricting local discretion on school revenue, provides a good policy variation for a quasi-experimental design. Using district-level panel data on school finance in Michigan and neighboring states over the fiscal-year period of 1990–2004, I find that the reform has a negative effect on revenue levels. The sixth year after the reform and onwards, the reform reduces per-pupil revenue by $1,300 on average. The reform reduces revenue levels in both low- and high-revenue districts, but the higher-revenue districts tend to sustain more pronounced reductions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
