Abstract

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is prevalent in adolescence and is associated with increased risk for a variety of subsequent negative mental health outcomes, necessitating an evidence-based preventive approach. This pilot study examines the potential iatrogenic effects and feasibility of an evidence-based school program for the prevention of NSSI. Differences are examined between a general in-classroom prevention program (Happyles) and this program combined with a 1-h in-classroom psychoeducation module on NSSI (HappylesPLUS) in terms of primary (e.g., delay in NSSI onset and decrease in NSSI frequency, urges, probability of future engagement) and secondary outcomes (e.g., psychological distress, emotion regulation, help-seeking, and stigma) using a mixed-method design. A total of 651 secundary school pupils (Mage = 12.85 years; 49.8% female versus 50.2% male) were assigned to the Happyles program and HappylesPLUS. Participants filled out validated self-report questionnaires pre (T0) and post (T1, 6 weeks after T0) the school prevention program, including the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ), the Brief Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment Test (BNSSI-AT), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale—Short Form (ATSPPH-SF), and the Peer Mental Health Stigmatization Scale (PMHSS). Qualitative semi-structured interviews (at T2,6 weeks after T1) were conducted with participants with and without a history of NSSI. Overall, results show no iatrogenic effects of the NSSI-focused psychoeducation module. In terms of our primary outcome, both groups reported a reduced likelihood of future NSSI engagement from T0 to T1. Regarding secondary outcome measures, we also observed increased emotional awareness in both groups. The qualitative data suggest that the addition of the NSSI-specific module to the Happyles program may have direct benefits to some students with lived experience, such as increased help-seeking behavior for NSSI. Findings of this pilot study show that incorporating NSSI-specific modules into evidence-based school prevention programs is feasible and does not lead to iatrogenic effects. Future work is needed to evaluate the potential (longer-term) benefits of incorporating NSSI-focused modules to evidence-based mental health programs in the prevention of NSSI.

Highlights

  • Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is the deliberate self-inflicted damage of one's own body tissue without suicidal intent [1] and includes behaviors such as cutting, burning, and hitting oneself [2]

  • According to Hasking and colleagues [16], disclosure to parents, peers and teachers offers a positive outlook for future help-seeking, as long as the reaction to the NSSI disclosure occurs in an understanding and supportive manner

  • The prevalence of NSSI differed between both conditions, c2(1) = 5.53, p = 0.019, with a higher percentage of students reporting a history of NSSI in the HappylesPLUS (18.1%) than the Happyles condition (11.4%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is the deliberate self-inflicted damage of one's own body tissue without suicidal intent [1] and includes behaviors such as cutting, burning, and hitting oneself [2]. NSSI is prospectively associated with increased risk for a variety of negative mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, disordered eating, and personality disorders [7,8,9,10]. Only 17% of adolescents who engage in NSSI receive professional help for self-injury [2]. Research [eg., [17]] has shown that stigma related to NSSI as well as negative reactions (online/offline) increases the risk for NSSI and may create help-seeking barriers, and should, be targeted in the prevention of NSSI. While there has been an increase in our understanding over the past decade of the factors that govern risk of NSSI [e.g., [18]], the development of evidence-based approaches for prevention remained nascent [18]. The authors converge on the notion that school-based NSSI prevention and early intervention programs for young adolescents are likely to be most effective

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.