Abstract
Extensive scholastic dishonesty was found in two large Southern universities, although not to the same extent in each. This contrast raised the question of whether the observed differences in frequency were due to different personal background characteristics of the 8tudents at the two universities, or to the different forms of social control in use at the two institutions. This investigation indicates that both types of characteristics may be related to deviation, but that social control, or collectivity characteristics are more closely associated with deviation and better explain thte differences found than personal background, or member characteristics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
