Abstract

Background 26S proteasome inhibitors are a novel class of compounds entering clinical trials as a method to increase tumor sensitivity to standard chemotherapy. We determined the effect of alternate sequencing regimens of a proteasome inhibitor and gemcitabine on molecular and cellular responses in pancreatic cancer cells. Materials and methods MIA-PaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib either before, simultaneously or following exposure to gemcitabine. Expression of the cell cycle proteins p21 WAF1/CIP1 and p27 KIP1, and the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 were determined by Western blotting. Cell cycle changes and immediate or delayed induction of apoptosis were quantitated. Results Gemcitabine followed by bortezomib induced the greatest induction of apoptosis and long-term inhibition of cell growth. Bortezomib treatment led to accumulation of p21 WAF1/CIP1 and p27 KIP1 and decreased BCL-2; gemcitabine decreased p27 KIP1, induced BCL-2 and had no effect on p21 WAF1/CIP1. When these agents were given in combination or sequence, intermediate changes in these proteins were observed, and the alterations did not correlate with immediate or delayed induction of apoptosis. Conclusions Inhibition of the 26S proteasome following chemotherapy appears to be the most effective regimen, though changes in BCL-2, p21 WAF1/CIP1, p27 KIP1 do not necessarily correlate with the cellular effects when various sequences are examined. Therefore, these proteins may not be the most appropriate surrogate markers of efficacy of this regimen. These data provide the background for the development of the optimal regimen to be used in clinical trials.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.