Abstract
In recent years, driver assistance systems in cars, buses, and trucks have become more common and powerful. In particular, the introduction of AI methods to sensors, signal fusion, and traffic recognition allows us to step forward from actual level-2 assistance to level-3 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), where driving becomes autonomous and responsibility shifts from the driver to the automobile manufacturers. This, however, requires a high-precision risk assessment of failure, which can only be achieved by extensive data acquisition and statistical analysis of real traffic scenarios (which is impossible to perform by humans). Therefore, critical driving situations have to be identified and classified automatically. This paper develops and compares two different strategies—a traditional rule-based approach derived from deterministic causal considerations, and an AI-based approach trained with idealized cut-in, cut-out, and cut-through maneuvers. Application to a 10-h measurement sequence on a German highway demonstrates that the latter has the higher performance, whereas the former misses some of the safety-relevant events to be identified.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.