Abstract
Where did matter in the universe come from? Where does the mass of matter come from? Particle physicists have used the knowledge acquired in matter and space to imagine a standard scenario to provide satisfactory answers to these major questions. The dominant thought to explain the absence of antimatter in nature is that we had an initially symmetrical universe made of matter and antimatter and that a dissymmetry would have sufficed for more matter having constituted our world than antimatter. This dissymmetry would arise from an anomaly in the number of neutrinos resulting from nuclear reactions which suggest the existence of a new type of titanic neutrino who would exceed the possibilities of the standard model and would justify the absence of antimatter in the macrocosm. We believe that another scenario could better explain why we observe only matter. It involves the validation of the negative energy solution of the Dirac equation, itself derived from the Einstein energy equation. The theory of Relation describes a negative energy ocean with the creation of real particle/antiparticle pairs. The origin of the masses of the particles would come from this ocean. A physical mechanism would allow their separation in the opposite direction and, therefore, the matter would be enriched at the expense of the ocean. The matter would be favored without resorting to negation or annihilation of negative energy, without the need for a CP (the behavioral difference between particle and antiparticle) violation that would be responsible for matter/antimatter asymmetry in the universe. And without the savior contribution of an undetectable obese neutrino: his search appears to us more a desperate act towards an “ultra-massive catastrophe” than a real effort to try to discover what really happened.
Highlights
The standard model of the big bang makes it possible to reconstruct the history of the cosmos in large part, in good agreement with the astronomical observations, until the first fractions of a second that followed the zero-time
One of the questions that seem to have found a satisfactory answer concerns particle physicists: How did matter appear? The consensus is reached on the idea that in the moments following the initial moment of the big bang, when the universe is in a neutral matter state of photons for the most part and neutrinos, this neutral matter will transform and separate into matter and antimatter which will re-annihilate, etc., up to the present stage
The consensus is that there would have been an initially symmetrical universe made of matter and antimatter, there would still have been some dissymmetry in the particle laws, and this dissymmetry would have sufficed so that more particles remain than antiparticles, and this would explain why there would have been a small excess of particles which would have served to fabricate the cosmos we know [3]
Summary
The standard model of the big bang makes it possible to reconstruct the history of the cosmos in large part, in good agreement with the astronomical observations, until the first fractions of a second that followed the zero-time. The first results of the T2K experiment carried out since 2011 in Tokai, Japan, indicate that a very slight imbalance may have appeared during the disintegration of certain particles: heavy neutrinos This reaction gives birth to leptons (electron, muon, tau) or antileptons, but not in equal proportions: for 100,000 antileptons, 100,001 leptons would be formed. The thesis of a small violation of particle/antiparticle symmetry at the first moments of the universe is not a theoretical necessity The argument that this difference will prove to be crucial to demonstrate that after the appearance of matter and antimatter at about 10−30 seconds, obese, ultra-massive neutrinos would have broken the equilibrium of the cosmos, seems to us unfounded and desperate. ), from the equation of the theory of Relation, gives mass to these particles
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
