Abstract
The construction of low greenhouse gas emission buildings requires the consideration of both embodied and operational emissions. While embodied emissions mainly occur in the construction phase, the operational emissions occur during the entire building life and are influenced by future developments such as climate change, electricity grid decarbonization, and user behavior. Suitable methods which allow considering these uncertainties already during the design stage are robustness assessments.This study proposes a scenario-based robustness assessment method to investigate the effects of future developments on buildings’ greenhouse gas emissions. We investigate the scenario generation, building energy simulation, calculation of embodied and operational emissions, and the statistical evaluation of the results according to different robustness metrics. Two simulation models with different time scales are compared with a total of 12 test cases. Finally, the robustness assessment is demonstrated on a case study, where a total of 40 configurations against 1260 scenarios are investigated using five different robustness metrics: minimax regret, Spread, Maximin, Laplace’s Principle of insufficient reasoning, and Starr’s Domain criterion.For the case study, a multi-family house located in Zurich, Switzerland, we demonstrate how future developments, e.g., climate change and electricity grid decarbonization, influence the building's greenhouse gas emission performance. For example, with slow decarbonization, heat pump systems perform most robustly compared to the other analyzed heating and cooling systems. Depending on the chosen robustness metrics, it is further possible to rate the solutions according to optimistic, pessimistic, or optimal preference, making the proposed framework a valuable tool for decision-makers.In a time of transition, we conclude that analyzing building performance without future-oriented data is not suitable, and we encourage building designers to assess the impact of possible future scenarios in the design phase instead of purely using norm-based standard values, entirely based on data from the past.
Highlights
Similar to the previous analysis, we investigate the impact of fixing the climate change scenario on the robustness assessment
We presented a scenario-based robustness assessment method, compared two simulation models with different time scales and five robustness metrics
Simulation results were compared with a total of 12 test cases, and the robustness assessment was demonstrated on a case study
Summary
Buildings largely contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions, and it is undisputed that the building sector must be entirely decarbonized by the latest 2050 with ambitious goals already for 2030 [1]. The fraction of embodied emissions in buildings increases and reaches almost 50% in technologically advanced office and residential buildings [6] For this reason, it is crucial to investigate zero-carbon instead of zeroenergy buildings and shift towards a life cycle perspective to investigate the building’s contribution to global decarbonization [7]. Global warming will affect future building performance, which makes planning on historical weather data critical It is, crucial to include uncertainty in building energy assessments and to investigate the robustness of building energy systems against future conditions [9,11,12,13]. We need buildings that perform well under a set of diverse yet plausible futures with minimal carbon emissions in the construction phase
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.