Abstract

AbstractIn this paper we investigate the scattering of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in more than 137,000 document delivery requests submitted to a national document delivery service. We first summarize the major findings of the study with regards to the performance of the service. We then identify the “core” journals from which article requests were satisfied and address the following research questions: (a) Does the distribution of (core) journals conform to the Bradford's Law of Scattering? (b) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and impact factors, journals with high impact factors being used more often than the rest? (c) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being used more often than the rest? (d) What is the median age of use (half‐life) of requested articles in general? (e) Do requested articles that appear in core journals get obsolete more slowly? (f) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and journal impact factors, journals with high impact factors being obsolete more slowly? (g) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being obsolete more slowly? Based on the analysis of findings, we found that the distribution of highly and moderately used journal titles conform to Bradford's Law. The median age of use was 8 years for all requested articles. Ninety percent of the articles requested were 21 years of age or younger. Articles that appeared in 168 core journal titles seem to get obsolete slightly more slowly than those of all titles. We observed no statistically significant correlations between the frequency of journal use and ISI journal impact factors, and between the frequency of journal use and ISI‐ (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) cited half‐lives for the most heavily used 168 core journal titles. There was a weak correlation between usage of journals and ISI‐reported total citation counts. No statistically significant relationship was found between median age of use and journal impact factors and between median age of use and total citation counts. There was a weak negative correlation between ISI journal impact factors and cited half‐lives of 168 core journals, and a weak correlation between ISI citation half‐lives and use half‐lives of core journals. No correlation was found between cited half‐lives of 168 core journals and their corresponding total citation counts as reported by ISI. Findings of the current study are discussed along with those of other studies.

Highlights

  • Millions of articles get published in scientific and scholarly journals every year

  • A total of 91,314 document delivery requests fulfilled were satisfied from 5521 different journal titles

  • We reported the preliminary findings of a study on a scattering of journals and obsolescence based on 2-years’ worth of empirical data obtained from a national document delivery service

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Millions of articles get published in scientific and scholarly journals every year. Scientists and researchers make use of those articles to carry out their studies. Even large libraries with considerable collection development budgets cannot subscribe to all scientific journals needed by their users. Collection development policies of libraries in the past have usually been shaped by in-house use of journals. More and more libraries tend to subscribe to “core journals” only, while satisfying the need for less frequently requested titles through interlibrary borrowing and document delivery services. This is reflected in the service trends observed in member libraries of Association of Research Libraries (ARL): the number of interlibrary borrowing transactions has almost doubled (97%) between 1991 and 2000 (Kyrillidou & Young, 2001). The trend towards electronic document delivery is having an impact on commercial

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call