Abstract

In this article we discuss, as a proof of concept, how a network model can be used to analyse gaze tracking data coming from a preliminary experiment carried out in a biodiversity education research project. We discuss the network model, a simple directed graph, used to represent the gaze tracking data in a way that is meaningful for the study of students’ biodiversity observations. Our network model can be thought of as a scanning signature of how a subject visually scans a scene. We provide a couple of examples of how it can be used to investigate the personal identification processes of a biologist and non-biologist when they are carrying out a task concerning the observation of species-specific characteristics of two bird species in the context of biology education research. We suggest that a scanning signature can be effectively used to compare the competencies of different persons and groups of people when they are making observations on specific areas of interests.

Highlights

  • Eye tracking provides a continuous measure for the study of the learning process as it happens, providing a peek into the cognitive processes of the learning subject [1,2]

  • The data sequence in our example is an areas of interest (AOIs) code sequence obtained from TS1, a test subject with training in biology, who was asked to scan the scene and look for features in the animals that indicate an adaptation of the animal to its habitat

  • We have described a network model that promises to be very useful in analyzing gaze tracking data in educational research

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eye tracking provides a continuous measure for the study of the learning process as it happens, providing a peek into the cognitive processes of the learning subject [1,2]. The uniformity or lack of uniformity in the weights of the edges of a network, represented as the width of the edges, and the order of the edges, represented by the color of the edges, allows for a qualitative or quantitative inspection of the data and the detection of possible cognitive processes at work. To show how this can be so, we present a proof of concept study involving two participants

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.