Abstract

ABSTRACTPurpose: To compare the stromal bed surface quality and the accuracy of dissection depth after deep lamellar cuts using the Leonardo Da Vinci (LDV) femtosecond laser (Z6) and the ONE Microkeratome.Methods: Deep lamellar cuts were performed on nine human donor corneoscleral buttons: five with the LDV femtosecond (FS) laser (Z6) (Ziemer) and four with the ONE Microkeratome (MK) (Moria). Corneal thickness was measured with ultrasound pachymetry before and after the dissection. The Stromal bed quality was evaluated using light microscopy (n = 4) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n = 9). The surface roughness on SEM images was graded on the scale of 1 (smoothest) to 5 (roughest) by four observers, blinded to the method used. Particle analysis on the SEM images was performed in order to have an objective measure of smoothness.Results: The achieved dissection depth using the FS laser was 496.4 ± 46.4 µm when attempting 500 µm and 474 ± 60 µm with the microkeratome when attempting 350 µm. Histological evaluation of the corneoscleral buttons by both light and electron microscopy showed significantly smoother surface using the FS laser compared to the microkeratome. There were fewer and smaller particles observed in the SEM images of FS laser cut buttons (p < 0.001).The average observer based score of anterior surface roughness (50×) was 2.2 for the FS laser and 3.9 for the microkeratome dissections (p < 0.001).Conclusions: The LDV femtosecond laser (Z6) platform is capable of creating deep corneal lamellar dissection with smoother surface quality and with more predictable cut depth as compared to the One Microkeratome.

Highlights

  • Lamellar grafts are performed as the first choice graft for the majority of the patients requiring corneal transplants.[1,2] Currently, descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is the most popular form of endothelial keratoplasty (EK)

  • The Leonardo Da Vinci (LDV) femtosecond laser (Z6) platform is capable of creating deep corneal lamellar dissection with smoother surface quality and with more predictable cut depth as compared to the One Microkeratome

  • EK has been associated with quicker visual recovery, less postoperative astigmatism, reduced risk of infection and better wound integrity giving it clear advantages over penetrating keratoplasty.[3,4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lamellar grafts are performed as the first choice graft for the majority of the patients requiring corneal transplants.[1,2] Currently, descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is the most popular form of endothelial keratoplasty (EK). To date there have been a number of articles investigating this.[6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] Several authors have developed subjective (observer based grading) and objective (e.g. texture analysis) scores to quantify the smoothness of stromal beds using primarily scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for comparison.[7,11,13] FL and MK dissected corneas show good stromal bed quality, with MK resulting in better overall smoothness,[11,13] on closer examination of the literature a relationship between smoothness and low laser pulse energy (nJ)/high laser pulse frequency/ spot size has been indicated.[8,13,16,17] The Leonardo Da

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call