Abstract
SummaryCritical point‐drying is the standard method of preparation for scanning electron microscope studies of mycorrhizas. However, a number of recent studies on various biological specimens have shown disadvantages associated with this technique. These can be overcome by cryofixation, where specimens are frozen in liquid nitrogen and viewed in the frozen‐hydrated state. Three distinct types of mycorrhiza of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] were critical point‐dried or cryofixed, and were examined for differences in the preservation of both surface features and internal morphology after fracturing or cutting the material transversely.Surface features were better preserved in frozen‐hydrated mycorrhizas than in critical point‐dried ones. Surface cementing matrix seen in the former was partially or entirely removed by critical point‐drying. Some distortion of both fungal and plant cells also occurred after the latter treatment, and cell contents retained in frozen‐hydrated specimens were often lost after critical point‐drying. Fractured frozen‐hydrated material revealed surface features of the cortical cells and lobed Hartig net hyphae.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.