Abstract

Aim or Purpose: Scanning electron Microscopic evaluation of enamel and dentin after laser (Er, Cr: YSGG) versus conventional class V cavity preparation and after restoration of prepared primary molars with injectable Giomer.Materials-Methods: Forty primary mandibular second molars were collected. Molars were divided into four equal groups, group (I) class V prepared with the high-speed Diamond bur, group (II) class V prepared with the high-speed Diamond bur and restored with injectable Giomer after adhesive application, group (III) class V prepared with non-contact (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser and group (IV) class V prepared with non-contact (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser and restored with injectable Giomer without adhesive application. Molars were sectioned perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth using a low speed diamond disc under water coolant. Evaluation of enamel and dentin after cavity preparation, and at enamel and dentin / restoration interfaces were observed with Scanning Electron Microscope.Results: In group (I) well-defined smooth cavity floor and walls were almost covered with a debris-like smear layer. In group (II) After acid etching, the smear layer was completely removed and enamel rods or dentinal tubules were clearly visible. In group (III) Irradiated enamel had a characteristic appearance resembling (Lava flow) with open enamel prisms. Protruding dentinal tubules were observed. No visible cracks or carbonization were detected. In group (IV) Laser produced micro-retentive morphological pattern without the production of smearlayer.Conclusions: It can be concluded that (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser can be an alternative technique for conservative caries removal and provided better bonding of the restoration to primary teeth.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call