Scaling the Analytical Information Given by Several Types of Colorimetric and Spectroscopic Instruments Including Smartphones: Rules for Their Use and Establishing Figures of Merit of Solid Chemosensors.

Abstract

The analytical information given by different types of instruments was scaled in order to establish suitably the figures of merit of a given methodology based on color measurements. Different lab and portable instruments, including smartphones with and without a miniaturized spectrophotometer accessory, have been tested. In order to obtain broad information and using objective criteria, these instruments have been compared from (1) the analytical point of view, considering mainly the detection limit (limits of detection [LODs]), selectivity, accuracy and intra- and interday precision, size, components, and costs; and (2) the environmental point of view, based on their footprint as kilograms of CO2. No significant differences in the precision were obtained with RSD (%) values lower than 10% for all of the instruments, but the achieved values of LOD, selectivity, accuracy, and cost were different. Footprints of CO2 were better for portable instrumentation, especially for smartphones. Three solid chemosensors made of different materials (PDMS, paper, or nylon) have been tested for the determination of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide at different concentration levels (ppb levels). As a result of this study, some rules for selecting the instrument for obtaining the required information have been established. Two apps have been developed for quantitation by smartphones, one for working with RGB values and the other for spectra obtained by the miniaturized spectrophotometer coupled to a smartphone.