Abstract

Neuroimaging work has shown that visual symmetry activates extrastriate brain areas, most consistently the lateral occipital complex (LOC). LOC activation increases with proportion of symmetrical dots (pSymm) in a degraded display. In the current work, we recorded a posterior ERP called the sustained posterior negativity (SPN), which is relatively negative for symmetrical compared to random patterns. We predicted that SPN would also scale with pSymm, because it is probably generated by the LOC. Twenty-four participants viewed dot patterns with different levels of regularity: 0% regularity (full random configuration) 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% (full reflection symmetry). Participants judged if the pattern contained “some regularity” or “no regularity”. As expected, the SPN amplitude increased with pSymm, while the latency and duration was the same in all conditions. The SPN was independent of the participant’s decision, and it was present on some trials where people reported ‘no-regularity’. We conclude that the SPN is generated at an intermediate stage of visual processing, probably in the LOC, where perceptual goodness is represented. This comes after initial visual analysis, but before subsequent decision stages, which apply a threshold to the analog LOC response.

Highlights

  • Symmetry is relevant for a variety of visual processes, such as for perceptual grouping and pattern recognition (Machilsen, Pauwels, & Wagemans, 2009), face recognition and for discriminating living organisms from non-living objects (Tyler, 1995)

  • Repeated measures ANOVA found a main effect of proportion of symmetrical dots (pSymm) (F(2.206, 50.742) = 437.123, p < 0.001, gp2 = .950)

  • Paired t-tests showed that for every level of pSymm from 20% up to 100%, participants were more likely to report some regularity than in the random condition (p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Symmetry is relevant for a variety of visual processes, such as for perceptual grouping and pattern recognition (Machilsen, Pauwels, & Wagemans, 2009), face recognition and for discriminating living organisms from non-living objects (Tyler, 1995). Symmetry discrimination is not an all or nothing affair: people can discriminate regularity in noisy displays (Barlow & Reeves, 1979). It is well known that humans and animals like symmetry, whether it is a property of abstract patterns (Eysenk, 1941; Jacobsen & Höfel, 2002; Makin, Pecchinenda, & Bertamini, 2012) or potential mates (Bertamini, Byrne, & Bennett, 2013; Grammer, Fink, Møller, & Thornhill, 2003; Rhodes, Proffitt, Grady, & Sumich, 1998). Despite the perceptual and emotional relevance of symmetry, its neural basis is still under investigation. There are many ways of classifying regular patterns, including Euclidian plane isometries, the 7 frieze groups and the 17

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call