Abstract

Quantitative functional anatomy of amniote thoracic and abdominal regions is crucial to understanding constraints on and adaptations for facilitating simultaneous breathing and locomotion. Crocodilians have diverse locomotor modes and variable breathing mechanics facilitated by basal and derived (accessory) muscles. However, the inherent flexibility of these systems is not well studied, and the functional specialisation of the crocodilian trunk is yet to be investigated. Increases in body size and trunk stiffness would be expected to cause a disproportionate increase in muscle force demands and therefore constrain the basal costal aspiration mechanism, necessitating changes in respiratory mechanics. Here, we describe the anatomy of the trunk muscles, their properties that determine muscle performance (mass, length and physiological cross‐sectional area [PCSA]) and investigate their scaling in juvenile Alligator mississippiensis spanning an order of magnitude in body mass (359 g–5.5 kg). Comparatively, the expiratory muscles (transversus abdominis, rectus abdominis, iliocostalis), which compress the trunk, have greater relative PCSA being specialised for greater force‐generating capacity, while the inspiratory muscles (diaphragmaticus, truncocaudalis ischiotruncus, ischiopubis), which create negative internal pressure, have greater relative fascicle lengths, being adapted for greater working range and contraction velocity. Fascicle lengths of the accessory diaphragmaticus scaled with positive allometry in the alligators examined, enhancing contractile capacity, in line with this muscle's ability to modulate both tidal volume and breathing frequency in response to energetic demand during terrestrial locomotion. The iliocostalis, an accessory expiratory muscle, also demonstrated positive allometry in fascicle lengths and mass. All accessory muscles of the infrapubic abdominal wall demonstrated positive allometry in PCSA, which would enhance their force‐generating capacity. Conversely, the basal tetrapod expiratory pump (transversus abdominis) scaled isometrically, which may indicate a decreased reliance on this muscle with ontogeny. Collectively, these findings would support existing anecdotal evidence that crocodilians shift their breathing mechanics as they increase in size. Furthermore, the functional specialisation of the diaphragmaticus and compliance of the body wall in the lumbar region against which it works may contribute to low‐cost breathing in crocodilians.

Highlights

  • Vertebrate trunk muscles can have multifaceted functions in locomotion, body support and respiration (Carrier, 1987; Codd et al, 2005; Farmer & Carrier, 2000a; O'Reilly et al, 2000; Schilling, 2011)

  • In crocodilians, breathing and locomotion are decoupled by their upright gait, derived accessory breathing muscles and transverse processes on the vertebrae that function as attachment sites for epaxial muscles, thereby reducing lateral trunk bending (Farmer & Carrier, 2000b)

  • These functional changes further support the accessory role of the diaphragmaticus as well as the hypothesis that larger individuals are more dependent on a respiratory role of transversus abdominis (TA) B L E 3 Conditions under which different muscles have been observed to be active in breathing and locomotion in crocodilians

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Vertebrate trunk muscles can have multifaceted functions in locomotion, body support and respiration (Carrier, 1987; Codd et al, 2005; Farmer & Carrier, 2000a; O'Reilly et al, 2000; Schilling, 2011). Lung ventilation in crocodilians is facilitated via contractions of trunk muscles that control costal rotation, visceral displacement, pelvic rotation, vertebral flexion and translation of gastralia on the ventral surface (Claessens, 2009; Codd et al, 2019; Farmer & Carrier, 2000a; Gans & Clark, 1976; Naifeh et al, 1970) Two components of this system are ancestral. Body temperature, digestive state and being partially or fully submerged in water all influence muscle recruitment These factors often covary in studies, making it difficult to understand their independent effects upon breathing (Codd et al, 2019; Gans & Clark, 1976; Munns et al, 2012; Uriona & Farmer, 2006). We provide functional muscle descriptions and discuss our findings in relation to empirical evidence on muscle functions in breathing and locomotion

| METHODS
| RESULTS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call