Abstract

Cities have a critical role to play in meeting global-scale biodiversity targets. Urban socio-ecological systems connect human and ecological well-being. The outsized impact of cities reaches well-beyond their geographic borders through cultural, ecological, and economic interactions. Although cities account for just 2% of the earth's surface, they host over half of the human population and are responsible for 75% of consumption. The Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and others have acknowledged the important role cities can play in achieving global targets. In response, at least 110 cities have produced plans focused on biodiversity, but we do not know the extent to which these city plans align with global targets or what role they play in achieving these targets. Here, we explore the relationship between global biodiversity conservation targets and local biodiversity plans to identify how elements at the two scales align or diverge. We compared the CBD Strategic Plan 2011–2020 (Aichi Targets) with 44 local biodiversity plans (often called LBSAPs) from cities around the world. We analyzed more than 2,800 actions from the local plans to measure the relationship with these global targets. Our results show how local approaches to biodiversity conservation can inform post-2020 global frameworks to improve coordination between global and local scale processes. We identify actions particular to the local scale that are critical to conserve global biodiversity and suggest a framework for improved coordination between actors at different scales that address their respective roles and spheres of influence.

Highlights

  • While much attention to nature conservation and biodiversity loss has focused on remaining undeveloped “natural” areas and on national-level actions that target these places, the roles of urban areas and local governments should not be overlooked

  • Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans adopted as policy instrument” (AT17) at 77%, “Ecosystems restored and resilience enhanced” (AT14) at 77%, “Invasive alien species prevented and controlled” (AT9) at 68%, and “Invasive Alien Species (IAS) prevented and controlled” (AT9) at 68%

  • The discussion is organized by Aichi Target (AT) themes, sometimes overlapping themes are combined, indicated by their number in the subheading (i.e., AT1 indicates the theme for Aichi Target 1, “Awareness increased”)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While much attention to nature conservation and biodiversity loss has focused on remaining undeveloped “natural” areas and on national-level actions that target these places, the roles of urban areas and local governments should not be overlooked. Aichi Targets and Local Plans nature-based solutions (Kabisch et al, 2016) and promote sustainable lifestyles. Urban and peri-urban land use patterns and the behavior of urbanites can play a critical and decisive role in meeting global biodiversity goals and targets and are critical to the implementation of international efforts to safeguard biodiversity (Puppim de Oliveira et al, 2011). It is clear that cities have a disproportionate impact on the earth’s natural systems and the species that live within them (Puppim de Oliveira et al, 2011). Cities have the potential to shape society to one that protects nature, reduces harmful consumption patterns, and seeks out nature-based solutions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call