Abstract

It is widely recognized that future rainfall extremes will intensify. This expectation is tied to the Clausius-Clapeyron (CC) relation, stating that the maximum water vapour content in the atmosphere increases by 6–7% per degree warming. Scaling rates for the dependency of hourly precipitation extremes on near-surface (dew point) temperature derived from day-to-day variability have been found to exceed this relation (super-CC). However, both the applicability of this approach in a long-term climate change context, and the physical realism of super-CC rates have been questioned. Here, we analyse three different climate change experiments with a convection-permitting model over Western Europe: simple uniform-warming, 11-year pseudo-global warming and 11-year global climate model driven. The uniform-warming experiment results in consistent increases to the intensity of hourly rainfall extremes of approximately 11% per degree for moderate to high extremes. The other two, more realistic, experiments show smaller increases—usually at or below the CC rate—for moderate extremes, mostly resulting from significant decreases to rainfall occurrence. However, changes to the most extreme events are broadly consistent with 1.5–2 times the CC rate (10–14% per degree), as predicted from the present-day scaling rate for the highest percentiles. This result has important implications for climate adaptation.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes and implications for flash flood risks’.

Highlights

  • Sub-daily precipitation extremes can cause local flash floods, strong soil erosion and landslides, and are a potential threat to society

  • We focus on the following questions: 1. Can we find evidence of climate scaling rates exceeding the CC rate as suggested by apparent scaling? Does this depend on the experimental setup with different degrees of thermodynamic and dynamical changes? Does this depend on the return level or percentile of the extreme?

  • We performed three sets of experiments with a convection-permitting climate model to study the climate change response of hourly precipitation extremes in relation to apparent scaling on dew point temperature derived from day-to-day variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sub-daily precipitation extremes can cause local flash floods, strong soil erosion and landslides, and are a potential threat to society Because these extremes are mostly related to summertime convective storms, with complex dynamics at cloud scales up to the atmospheric mesoscale of several hundreds of km, they are difficult to predict in numerical weather predictions, and in a climate change context due to a lack of resolution in climate models and/or relative short simulations. It has been proposed that super-CC scaling may be due to the use of percentiles conditional on the occurrence of rain [16,24] Given these potential caveats, one may question the relevance of apparent scaling in understanding future changes to precipitation extremes. Can we use the scaling diagram to relate the climate change response to characteristics of the apparent scaling? And alternatively, can we use the apparent scaling framework differently to understand for which dew point temperature ranges precipitation extremes are most sensitive to warming?

Methods
Results
Discussion
Findings
20 France W France S
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call