Abstract

BackgroundThe positive relationship between habitat area and species number is considered a fundamental rule in ecology. This relationship predicts that the link number of species interactions increases with habitat area, and structure is related to habitat area. Biological invasions can affect species interactions and area relationships. However, how these relationships change at different spatial scales has remained unexplored. We analysed understory plant–pollinator networks in seven temperate forest sites at 20 spatial scales (radius 120–2020 m) to clarify scale-associated relationships between forest area and plant–pollinator networks.ResultsThe pooled data described interactions between 18 plant (including an exotic) and 89 pollinator (including an exotic) species. The total number of species and the number of interaction links between plant and pollinator species were negatively correlated with forest area, with the highest correlation coefficient at radii of 1520 and 1620 m, respectively. These results are not concordant with the pattern predicted by species–area relationships. However, when associations with exotic species were excluded, the total number of species and the number of interaction links were positively correlated with forest area (the highest correlation coefficient at a radius of 820 m). The network structure, i.e., connectance and nestedness, was also related to forest area (the highest correlation coefficients at radii of 720–820 m), when associations with exotics were excluded. In the study area, the exotic plant species Alliaria petiolata, which has invaded relatively small forest patches surrounded by agricultural fields, may have supported more native pollinator species than initially expected. Therefore, this invasive plant may have altered the original relationships between forest area and plant–pollinator networks.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate scale-dependent effects of forest area on the size and structure of plant–pollinator networks. We also suggest that a single exotic plant species can impact plant–pollinator networks, even in temperate continental habitats.

Highlights

  • The positive relationship between habitat area and species number is considered a fundamental rule in ecology

  • The main goal of this study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) the total number of species increases with forest area, (2) the network metrics of plant–pollinator interactions are related to the total number of species and forest area, (3) the relationships between forest area and plant–pollinator networks are scale-dependent, and (4) exotic species impact the relationships between forest area and plant–pollinator networks

  • The number of plant species was not related to forest area, while the number of pollinator species and total species were negatively correlated with forest area, with the highest correlation coefficient at radii of 1420 and 1520 m, respectively (Figure 2a, 3c, 3e)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The positive relationship between habitat area and species number is considered a fundamental rule in ecology. Biological invasions can affect species interactions and area relationships How these relationships change at different spatial scales has remained unexplored. Because the Species–area relationships suggest that the number of interaction links among species, such as prey–predator and plant–pollinator species, increases with island or habitat area [9,10]. Given that networks of species interactions usually involve different taxonomic groups [20,21], different spatial scales may affect the relationships between these networks and habitat area. How habitat area influences interaction networks at different spatial scales at the landscape level has remained unexplored

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call