Abstract

With a novel experimental design we investigate whether risk perception, return expectations, and investment propensity are influenced by the scale of the vertical axis in charts. We explore this for two presentation formats, namely return charts and price charts, where we depict low- and high-volatility assets with distinct trends. We find that varying the scale strongly affects people’s risk perception, as a narrower scale of the vertical axis leads to significantly higher perceived riskiness of an asset even if the underlying volatility is the same. Furthermore, past returns predict future return expectations almost perfectly. In our setting perceived profitability was considered more important than perceived riskiness when making investment choices. Overall we show that adapting the scale of a chart makes it easier to recognize yearly return variations within a single security, but at the same time makes it harder to identify differences between dissimilar securities. This is something regulators should be aware of and take into account in the rules they set.

Highlights

  • When Gulliver traveled to Lilliput he was a giant

  • We start our discussion by examining the influence of the scaling of the vertical axis on risk perception

  • We present analyses along the following dimensions: for both presentation formats ( RETURN and PRICE charts) we compare the influence of scaling of the vertical axis ( WIDE vs. NARROW )

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When Gulliver traveled to Lilliput he was a giant. On his journey to Brobdingnag he was a dwarf. We find that varying the scale strongly affects people’s risk perception, namely, that a narrower scale of the vertical axis leads to significantly higher perceived riskiness of an asset across price and return charts, even if the underlying volatility is the same. We demonstrate that adapting the scale to the span of the bars is reasonable with regard to recognizing yearly return variations within a single security, but at the same time makes it harder to identify differences between dissimilar securities. This result is robust for different historical return trends. Keeping the presentation scale constant across different securities enables better identification of risk and easier comparisons

Returns and prices
Experimental tasks
Implementation of the experiment
Results from Task I: individual assessments
Risk perception in individual assessments
Result
Expected returns in individual assessments
Investment preferences in individual assessments
Results from Task II: pairwise comparisons
Investment preferences in pairwise comparisons
Discussion and conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.