Abstract
The transition from supercritical to subcritical flow is characterised by a strong dissipative mechanism, a hydraulic jump. Herein a comparative analysis of physical data is presented with a focus on a broad range of two-phase flow parameters. The results show that, for hydraulic jumps with Fr1=5.1, the void fraction data obtained with Re<4×104 could not be scaled up to Re=1×105. Most air–water flow properties measured with Reynolds numbers up to 1.25×105 could not be extrapolated to large-size prototype structures without significant scale effects in terms of bubble count rate, turbulence, bubble chord time distributions and bubble cluster characteristics. The findings have some implications of civil and sanitary engineering designs, because most hydraulic structures, storm water systems and water treatment facilities operate with Reynolds numbers larger than 106 to over 108.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.