Abstract

Automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) require varying levels of functionalities and model details at different phases of the electric vehicles (EV) development process, with a trade-off between accuracy and execution time. This article proposes a scalable modelling approach depending on the multi-objective targets between model functionalities, accuracy and execution time. In this article, four different fidelity levels of modelling approaches are described based on the model functionalities, accuracy and execution time. The highest error observed between the low fidelity (LoFi) map-based model and the high fidelity (HiFi) physics-based model is 5.04%; while, the simulation time of the LoFi model is ~10 4 times faster than corresponding one of the HiFi model. A detailed comparison of all characteristics between multi-fidelity models is demonstrated in this paper. Furthermore, a dSPACE SCALEXIO Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) testbench, equipped with a minimal latency of 18 μ sec, is used for real-time (RT) model implementation of the EV's HV DC/DC converter. The performance of the entire HiL setup is compared with the Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) setup and the highest RMSE is limited to 0.54 among the HiL and MiL results. Moreover, the accuracy (95.7%) of the passive component loss estimation is verified through the Finite Element Method (FEM) software model. Finally, the experimental results of a full-scale 30-kW SiC DC/DC converter prototype are presented to validate the accuracy and correlation between multi-fidelity models. It has been observed that the efficiency deviation between the hardware prototype and multi-fidelity models is less than 1.25% at full load. Furthermore, the SiC Interleaved Bidirectional Converter (IBC) prototype achieves a high efficiency of 98.4% at rated load condition.

Highlights

  • The average temperature of global land and ocean in June 2019 was more than 1.71◦C above average and it was record-breaking temperature since global records calculation started in 1880 [1]

  • The unique scalable modelling approach presented in this article will guide the non-power electronics users (OEMs/ end users) to select the appropriate fidelity based on the testing purpose and development objectives of the battery electric vehicles (BEVs) as the short circuit testing in the semiconductor module or the energy consumption and the thermal consumption routine optimization of several hundred km of the electric vehicles (EV)’s driving do not required the same level of functionalities, accuracy and speed

  • THE Interleaved Bidirectional Converter (IBC) HIL TESTBENCH DEVELOPMENT Standard modelling procedures are used by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to reduce the time, cost, and risk associated with the full-scale testing of products

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The average temperature of global land and ocean in June 2019 was more than 1.71◦C above average and it was record-breaking temperature since global records calculation started in 1880 [1]. F. CONTRIBUTIONS OF THIS ARTICLE None of these publications in [26]–[44], discussed converter’s optimization processes with detailed modelling issues such as universal switch model, instantaneous loss profile of power device and passive components (inductor and capacitor) and liquid-cooling thermal modelling for dynamic BEV simulation. The unique scalable modelling approach presented in this article will guide the non-power electronics users (OEMs/ end users) to select the appropriate fidelity based on the testing purpose and development objectives of the BEVs as the short circuit testing in the semiconductor module or the energy consumption and the thermal consumption routine optimization of several hundred km of the EV’s driving do not required the same level of functionalities, accuracy and speed. The detailed operational mode of the IBC is discussed below

MODES OF OPERATION
SEMICONDUCTORS
SWITCHING LOSSES MODEL
JUNCTION-TO-CASE THERMAL MODEL
CASE-TO-HEATSINK THERMAL MODEL
HEATSINK-TO-COOLANT THERMAL MODEL
PASSIVE COMPONENTS MODELLING
LOSSES MODELLING OF PASSIVE COMPONENTS
THE IBC HIL TESTBENCH DEVELOPMENT
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call