Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
We investigate whether shareholders take into account CEO outside opportunities when casting their say on pay (SoP) votes. By employing the staggered rejection of the inevitable disclosure doctrine (IDD) by US states as an exogenous shock that increases key talent outflow risk, we find that IDD rejection moderates the well-documented positive relation between CEO pay and dissenting SoP votes. The effect is concentrated in firms with more able managers, higher firm efficiency, better operating performance, and greater uncertainty of a new manager's ability. Our results are the first to highlight talent retention as an important motive for affirmative SoP votes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
