Abstract
Objective Intraosseous access (IO) is becoming increasingly accepted in adult populations as an alternative to peripheral vascular access; however, there is still insufficient evidence in large patient groups supporting its use. Methods Retrospective review. This paper reports on the use of IO devices over a 7-year period from August 2006 to August 2013 during combat operations in Afghanistan. A database search of the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) was carried out looking for all the incidences of IO access use during this time. Excel (Microsoft) was used to manage the dataset and perform descriptive statistics on the patient demographics, injuries, treatments and complications that were retrieved. Results 1014 IO devices were used in 830 adult patients with no major complications. The rate of minor complications, the majority of which were device failure, was 1.38%. 5124 separate infusions of blood products or fluids occurred via IO access, with 36% being of packed red cells. On average, each casualty received 6.95 different infusions of blood products and fluids, and 3.28 separate infusions of drugs through IO access. 32 different drugs were infused to 367 patients via IO, the most frequent being anaesthetic agents. IO access was used in the prehospital environment, during tactical helicopter evacuation and within hospitals. Conclusions IO access can be used to administer a wide variety of life-saving medications quickly, easily and with low-complication rates. This highlights its valuable role as an alternative method of obtaining vascular access, vital when resuscitating the critically injured trauma patient.
Highlights
This paper reports on the use of Intraosseous access (IO) devices over a 7 year period from August 2006 to August 2013 during combat operations in Afghanistan
1014 IO devices were used in 830 adult patients with no major complications
The rate of minor complications, the majority of which were device failure, was 1.38%. 5124 separate infusions of blood products or fluids occurred via IO access, with 36% being of packed red cells
Summary
Saving the critically injured trauma patient: a retrospective analysis of 1000 uses of intraosseous access From London Trauma Conference 2014 London, UK. Objective Intraosseous access (IO) is becoming increasingly accepted in adult populations as an alternative to peripheral vascular access; there is still insufficient evidence in large patient groups supporting its use. This paper reports on the use of IO devices over a 7 year period from August 2006 to August 2013 during combat operations in Afghanistan.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.