Abstract

This case study contrasts centralized ex situ conservation of food and crop plant genetic resources with many Native Americans' preference for informal, localized in situ conservation. First, I examine ex situ genebanks operated by governments and research institutions, with particular attention to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault built into the mountainous permafrost on a Norwegian island in the High Arctic. Second, I describe Native American seed-saving efforts in the United States, drawing primarily on projects to preserve culturally significant seeds and promote food sovereignty at the local or tribal level. In general, Native American projects focus on the integration of cultural heritage and food independence through understandings of seeds as a tribal commons. Through these contrasting cases—the Svalbard vault and localized Native American seed-saving projects—I analyze the ways in which divergent understandings of seedness and seed ownership are crucial elements in discussions of seeds as property. In conclusion, I point out that the Svalbard Global Seed Vault is unique in its potential ability to cross the political and cultural divide over the ownership and conservation of seeds and thereby promote the vital ecological need for both ex situ and in situ seed preservation. Furthermore, I argue that recognition of the divergent understandings of seedness provides a useful way of examining the complementarity and limitations of specific models of in situ and ex situ seed conservation and, more broadly, the future of farmers' rights to the genetic heritage developed over generations in the fields.

Highlights

  • The Problems of Property Issues of ownership are inherent in the discussion of food systems and the seeds that constitute their foundations

  • For this reason, seed sovereignty is an essential component of food sovereignty, for “those who cannot ensure through ownership or other forms of control that they will reap benefits from the resources cannot be expected to go to the expense of conserving them for the use and aggrandizement of others

  • The very existence of the resource which feeds humanity is tied to patterns and arrangements of ownership and control and how these affect the way in which the benefits of diversity are shared, or not” (Fowler, 1994, p. xv)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I describe some of the Native American seed-saving efforts in the U.S, drawing primarily on projects to preserve heritage and culturally significant seeds and to devise food sovereignty policies at the local or tribal level. Through these contrasting cases—the Svalbard vault and localized Native American seed-saving projects—I examine the ways that divergent understandings of “seedness” and seed ownership are crucial elements in the political problem of seeds as property.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call