Abstract

This study discusses critical strategic factors associated with concerns over implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) mandate of December 2016. Emergent Human Resources (HR) strategies developed by human resource managers were investigated, as well as how these managers influenced issues directly linked with employee engagement, communication, employee status, and organizational responses. Interviews were facilitated less than four months prior to the mandate’s implementation. Investigators found the FLSA mandate created concerns for human resource managers based on current organizational practices, compensation, and bonus structures, as well as employee morale challenges. Specific findings included a desire for organizational communication concerning changes due to the mandate, but a universal lack of strategic planning or implementation of a process to preserve employee engagement. Further, HR management concerns regarding employee morale and consequent action were investigated, as a change in status from exempt to non-exempt would be perceived as a demotion by most employees. This research finds that the ability to communicate changes with constituents, help manage implementation for HR employees, care for morale and cultural repercussions, and demonstrate fairness in compensation are critical factors to consider for a large-scale change and implementation in HR policy due to sweeping regulatory changes.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWe examined how a sample of organizations chose to respond in the face of externally driven change, in this case initiated by government regulatory requirements

  • Dave Ulrich states “change has a way of scaring people – scaring them into inaction” in his discussion of human resource department management [1]

  • Eight human resource managers were interviewed to determine primary concerns and responses associated with organizational change stemming from implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We examined how a sample of organizations chose to respond in the face of externally driven change, in this case initiated by government regulatory requirements. We compared their actual responses, or strategies, to three predicted responses that were derived from the existing change management literature. These predicted responses were seen as what organizations might be expected to do in the event of imposed change. Eight human resource managers were interviewed to determine primary concerns and responses associated with organizational change stemming from implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). McCraken’s process of analysis was used to understand the predominant concerns and actions associated with mitigating potential ill effects on employee engagement

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.