Abstract

The question of the origin of language is becoming a purely biological thematics. Three distinct events can be considered as the main sources of the biologisation of this question, i.e. the mechanistic and materialistic interpretations of the Darwinian theory; the prohibition promulgated by the Societe Linguistique de Paris in 1866; Saussurian linguistics. In the Cours de linguistique generale, Saussure bans the question of the origin of language because of two impossibilities: an essential impossibility and a theoretical impossibility. The essential impossibility is a limitation of the domain of linguistics. Indeed, language is defined as a human fact, which is always inherited as a complete whole by every community of speakers. Language being a complete whole, its origin is out of the domain of linguistics. The theoretical impossibility is an admission of the incapacity of linguistics to resolve the problem of the origin of language. These two impossibilities, having the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign as their main cause, show that Saussurian linguistics is an instance of fixism and uniformitarism. In this paper, I will explain these two impossibilities and argue for a new approach, between biologism and sociologism, of the origin of language.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.