Abstract
This paper was motivated by the following two questions which arise in the theory of complexity for computation over ordered rings in the now famous computational model introduced by Blum, Shub and Smale: 1. (i) is the answer to the question P = ?NP the same in every real-closed field? 2. (ii) if P ≠ NP for R , does there exist a problem of R which is NP but neither P nor NP-complete ? Some unclassical complexity classes arise naturally in the study of these questions. They are still open, but we could obtain unconditional results of independent interest. Michaux introduced/const complexity classes in an effort to attack question (i). We show that A R /const = A R , answering a question of his. Here A is the class of real problems which are algorithmic in bounded time. We also prove the stronger result: PAR R /const = PAR R , where PAR stands for parallel polynomial time. In our terminology, we say that R is A-saturated and PAR-saturated. We also prove, at the nonuniform level, the above results for every real-closed field. It is not known whether R is P-saturated. In the case of the reals with addition and order we obtain P-saturation (and a positive answer to question (ii)). More generally, we show that an ordered Q -vector space is P-saturated at the nonuniform level (this almost implies a positive answer to the analogue of question (i)). We also study a stronger notion that we call P-stability. Blum, Cucker, Shub and Smale have (essentially) shown that fields of characteristic 0 are P-stable. We show that the reals with addition and order are P-stable, but real-closed fields are not. Questions (i) and (ii) and the/const complexity classes have some model theoretic flavor. This leads to the theory of complexity over “arbitrary” structures as introduced by Poizat. We give a summary of this theory with a special emphasis on the connections with model theory and we study/const complexity classes from this point of view. Note also that our proof of the PAR-saturation of R shows that an o-minimal structure which admits quantifier elimination is A-saturated at the nonuniform level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.