Abstract

Study ObjectiveNo prior study has directly compared satisfaction with Depo-Provera to the Mirena intra-uterine device (IUD) among post-partum parous adolescents. Our aim was to make this comparison among post-partum adolescents at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. ParticipantsPost-partum/parous adolescents (aged 20 and younger) choosing either Depo-Provera or the Mirena IUD as their method of contraception. DesignProspective longitudinal survey. SettingThe adolescent clinic at the Truman Medical Center, Kansas City Missouri. Main Outcome MeasureSatisfaction with and intention to continue the chosen method at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. InterventionsNone. ResultsSixty-six post-partum/parous adolescents were recruited, 37 choosing the Mirena IUD and 29 choosing Depo-Provera for contraception. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference in overall satisfaction with Depo-Provera versus the Mirena IUD at 3, 6, or 12 months of follow-up. For both contraceptive methods, unpredictable bleeding was most unacceptable at 6 months of follow-up but the trend was only statistically significant for Depo-Provera. For Depo-Provera, there was a significantly lower proportion of participants actually continuing the method at 12 months (42.9%) relative to the proportion who at 6 months had expressed an intention to continue (80.0%; P = .01). This trend was not seen for the Mirena IUD. ConclusionAmong post-partum/parous adolescents, overall subjective satisfaction with Depo-Provera and the Mirena IUD is similarly high over 12 months of follow-up. With Depo-Provera, however, there appears to be a disconnect between intention to continue at 6 months and actual continuation at 12 months.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.