Abstract

Objective: To determine the satisfaction level of neurosurgery outpatients of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurologicas (INCN), Lima, from October to November 2016. Materials and methods: A quantitative, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study was conducted in 314 patients. The study used the SERVQUAL survey to calculate the mean differential score, as well as the ANCOVA analysis and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: Overall satisfaction accounted for 19.4 % (61) and overall dissatisfaction, 80.6 % (253), which included both mild and moderate dissatisfaction. Fifty-five point one percent (55.1 %) (173) of middle-aged adults expressed overall dissatisfaction. The mean differential score for all the dimensions reached 0.77 (reliability 0.91, responsiveness 0.85, safety 0.44, empathy 1.03 and tangible aspects 0.52). Middle-aged adults presented dissatisfaction in all dimensions: tangibility 36.6 % (115), reliability 13.3 % (42), responsiveness 46.8 % (147), safety 14.9 % (47) and empathy 55.1 % (173). A statistically significant low positive correlation was observed between patients’ education level and satisfaction with appointment scheduling (r = 0.185), patients’ education level and respect for privacy (r = 0.196), and type of patient and fast radiological examination service (r = 0.184). A statistically significant low negative correlation was observed between patients’ education level and satisfaction with regard to understanding the neurosurgeon’s explanations of the treatment (r = -0.212), adequacy of posters and signs for orientation (r = -0.233), availability of equipment and materials needed for healthcare (r = -0.175), and cleanliness and comfort of the waiting room (r = -0.175). Conclusions: Four (4) out of five (5) patients expressed dissatisfaction. A direct correlation was observed between patients’ education level and satisfaction with appointment scheduling and respect for privacy. Patients’ origin was associated with understanding the neurosurgeon’s explanations of the treatment.

Highlights

  • Materials and methods: A quantitative, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study was conducted in 314 patients

  • Overall satisfaction accounted for 19.4 % (61) and overall dissatisfaction, 80.6 % (253), which included both mild and moderate dissatisfaction

  • A statistically significant low negative correlation was observed between patients’ education level and satisfaction with regard to understanding the neurosurgeon’s explanations of the treatment (r = -0.212), adequacy of posters and signs for orientation (r = -0.233), availability of equipment and materials needed for healthcare (r = -0.175), and cleanliness and comfort of the waiting room (r = -0.175)

Read more

Summary

ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL

Satisfacción del usuario externo de neurocirugía del Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima - Perú, 2016. Objetivo: Determinar el nivel de satisfacción del usuario externo de neurocirugía del Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas (INCN), Lima, octubre-noviembre, 2016. Estadísticamente significativa, entre el nivel de estudio del paciente y la satisfacción con la programación de citas (r=0,185), entre el nivel de estudio del paciente y el respeto a la privacidad (r=0,196); y entre el tipo de usuario y la atención rápida de exámenes radiológicos (r=0,184). Hubo correlación negativa baja estadísticamente significativa entre el nivel de estudio y la satisfacción sobre la comprensión de la explicación del neurocirujano sobre su tratamiento (r = -0,212), y los carteles o letreros son adecuados para orientar (r = -0,233), equipos disponibles y materiales para atención (r = -0175), y limpieza de sala de espera y comodidad (r = -0,175). Satisfaction of neurosurgery outpatients of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima - Peru, 2016

Results
MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS
Tipo de seguro n
Adulto mayor Total Adulto joven Adulto maduro Adulto mayor Total
Análisis de correlación
Sexo Nivel de Seguro Tipo de estudio usuario
Primaria Secundaria Superior
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.