Abstract

An unsupervised image classification technique employing image segmentation by ecological regions is evaluated using percentage accuracies and tau coefficients against an unsegmented two‐stage classification. k‐fold cross‐validation is used to partition the field data into training and testing sets. A Z‐test of the tau statistic and its variance is used to test for a significant increase in classification accuracy when using image segmentation. Results show a significant increase in classification accuracy (α = 0.05, one‐tailed) over two‐stage approaches (Z = 2.49, Z crit = 1.65 p = 0.0063). This supports our hypothesis that spectral variance within information classes can be explained, in part, by ecological region. Multi‐group discriminant analysis is performed using jack pine (Pinus banksiana) plant community spectral data, grouped by ecological region. Results show significant spectral differences in a single information class within different ecological regions, which support the image segmentation approach to classification. The minimum mappable unit (MMU) is discussed in the context of Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM). The plant association, or ecosite, is presented as the MMU and the physical and ecological properties are discussed in relation to their spectral properties. The results suggest refinements in data collection and image analysis for remotely sensed data in boreal environments. †Current address: Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Room 200, 4999 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6B 2X3. Email: olaf.jensen@ec.gc.ca

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call