Abstract
Designation of large expanses of the ocean as Marine Protected Area (MPA) is increasingly advocated and realised. The effectiveness of such MPAs, however, requires improvements to vessel monitoring and enforcement capability. In 2014 commercial fishing was excluded from the Ascension Island Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). In 2015, through updated regulations, a licenced fishery re-opened in the northern half of the EEZ while the southern half remained closed. To assess compliance with these closures and regulations, several promising satellite technologies (Satellite Automatic Identification System (S-AIS), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) of two vessels), were trialled alongside at-sea patrols. Use of SAR enabled assessment of ‘dark’ (non-AIS transmitting) vessels, the scope of whose activities are hardest to gauge. The high level of compliance with regulations observed, suggests the MPA may prove effective, yet a need for vigilance remains. Vessels aggregate near the EEZ border and a quarter of vessels tracked across three years exhibited S-AIS transmission gaps and present a heightened compliance risk. Use of remote, rather than local, expertise and infrastructure provide a blue-print and economies of scale for replicating monitoring across similarly sized MPAs; particularly for large (>~ 25 m) vessels with metallic superstructures conducive to SAR detection. Funding ongoing monitoring in Ascension is challenged by current levels of license uptake, which provides insufficient offsetting revenue. Satellite-derived intelligence, can be used to set risk thresholds and trigger detailed investigations. Planning long-term monitoring must, however, incorporate adequate resources for follow-up, through patrols and correspondence with flag-states and fisheries management organisations.
Highlights
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are increasingly applied at large spatial scales [1,2,3]
The number of vessels licensed to fish each year within the Ascension Island Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) has varied (Fig. 2a)
Since 1988, the majority of effort has been focussed in the north west, just inside the border of the EEZ, and vessel activities have extended seaward of this boundary (Fig. 4a)
Summary
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are increasingly applied at large spatial scales [1,2,3] This trend is promoted by the adoption of international protection targets of 10% of the ocean area, through the Convention for Biological Diversity's Aichi Target 11 [4], reiterated in United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal 14, Life Below Water [3,4,5]. VLMPAs are variously defined as areas over 30,000 km2 [6], or over 100,000 km2 [7] The latter include Papahānaumokuākea National Monument, the Chagos Marine Reserve, Easter Island and the Phoenix Island Protected Area [1,2,3]. The 2020 Aichi target has not as yet been reached, though trends in VLMPA designation have reduced the projected time to its achievement [8]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.