Abstract

Background: Twice city of Manaus located in the Brazilian rainforest, has experienced a health system collapse due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, little is known about which groups among the general population have been more affected. In this report, we present the overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated factors from the DETECTCoV-19 cohort. Methods: A convenience sampling strategy via online advertising recruited 3046 adults. Sociodemographic characteristics, COVID-19-related symptoms, COVID-19 testing, self-medication and prescribed medications were recorded. Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were measured with an in-house ELISA. Prevalence ratios (PR) were obtained using cluster-corrected and adjusted Poisson’s regression models. Findings: A crude positivity rate among asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals, was estimated at 29·10%, with a maximum seroprevalence of 41·53% corrected by test characteristics and an antibody decay rate of 27%. Regression models demonstrated a strong association towards marginalized low-income and vulnerable residents with limited health access. Presence of a COVID-19 case (PR 1·39, 1·24-1·57) or death (PR 2·14, 1·74-2·62) in a household increased greatly the risk of other household members acquiring infection. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was higher among those who self-medicated to prevent infection (PR 1·36, 1·27-1·46). Interpretation: High SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity reveals a much burdensome scenario than estimations based on confirmed COVID-19 cases in Manaus. Overall, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response demonstrated a disproportionate social and economic disparity among the study participants. The syndemic nature of COVID-19 in the Amazon region needs differential policies and urgent solutions to control the pandemic. Funding: Research was funded by Ministry of Education (MEC), Brazil. BBS, IVPF, ROS, ARCB and WBSS received scholarship from CAPES. DSSS, TBNM, MFF and NOC received scholarship from FAPEAMDeclaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: The research ethics committee of Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM) approved this study (CAAE:34906920·4·0000·5020) in accordance with Brazilian law

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call