Abstract

BackgroundAgeing is associated with a decline in skeletal muscle mass and function (strength and power), known as sarcopenia. Inadequate dietary protein and inactivity have been shown to accelerate sarcopenia outcomes, occurring at different rates in males and females. Regardless, active older adults who often exceed the exercise guidelines still show signs of sarcopenia. This study aimed to explore the link between age, physical activity, protein intake, and biological sex with skeletal muscle mass, strength, power, and physical capacity/performance in active older adults. Fifty-four active older adults were recruited from this trial and grouped according to age (middle aged: 50–59 years, and older age: ≥ 60 years), exercise volume (low: ≥ 90–149 min/week, moderate: ≥ 150–299 min/week, and high: ≥ 300 min/week), protein intake (low: < 0.8 g/kg body mass (BM), moderate: ≥ 0.8–1.19g /kg BM, and high: ≥ 1.2 g/kg BM), and biological sex (males and females). Skeletal muscle and fat mass (dual X-ray absorptiometry), strength (1-repetition maximum using leg press, chest press, lateral pull down, and hand grip), power (counter movement jump), and general fitness (cardiorespiratory capacity and gait speed) were assessed. Data were grouped based on variables, and a general linear model (ANCOVA) or an independent t test was used to determine between group differences.ResultsFifty three of the total participants’ data were analysed. The middle-aged group had 18%, 11%, and 10% higher leg press, chest press, and lateral pull down, respectively, compared to the older-aged group (p < .05). There were no significant differences between different levels of training volume and any of the outcomes. Higher protein intakes were associated with significantly less body fat mass (p = .005) and a trend towards a higher leg press (p = .053) and higher relative power (W/kg) (p = .056) compared with the moderate and low protein intake groups. Significant differences based on biological sex were observed for all outcomes except for gait speed (p = .611) and cardiorespiratory fitness (p = .147).ConclusionsContributions of age, physical activity, daily protein intake, and biological sex can explain the individual variation in outcomes related to changes in body composition, strength, power, and/or cardiorespiratory fitness in a cohort of active older adults.The preprint version of this work is available on Research Square: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-51873/v1.Trial RegistrationThis trial is registered in the ANZCTR.org.au, no. ACTRN12618001088235 (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375286).

Highlights

  • IntroductionAgeing is associated with a decline in skeletal muscle mass and function (strength and power), known as sarcopenia

  • Ageing is associated with a decline in skeletal muscle mass and function, known as sarcopenia

  • Body Composition Stratified by Age, Exercise Volume, Dietary Protein Intake, and Biological Sex The middle-aged group had a higher average bone mineral density compared with the older group, with a moderate association on age 7.6%, d = 0.562 (Table 2, A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ageing is associated with a decline in skeletal muscle mass and function (strength and power), known as sarcopenia. This study aimed to explore the link between age, physical activity, protein intake, and biological sex with skeletal muscle mass, strength, power, and physical capacity/ performance in active older adults. Highly competitive Masters level athletes (≥ 35 years) show declines of decreased cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., V O2 ) and peak power compared with younger trained athletes (i.e., 18–27 years) in a variety of sporting disciplines [4, 9] This decline in physical performance is most notable from the age of 50 years (middle-aged) until the age of 60–70 years (older) where it declines exponentially thereafter [10]. Understanding how age, habitual exercise, protein intakes, and biological sex may influence outcomes of body composition, strength, power, and physical performance (e.g., cardiorespiratory fitness and gait speed) in an active cohort may provide guidance for future intervention studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call