Abstract

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM), which is caused by the dimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides spp, is the most prevalent systemic mycosis in immunocompetent individuals in Brazil. The fungus lives in the soil and usually infects the patient through inhalation of airborne propagules, the lungs being the portal of entry. In areas of larger endemicity, such as Brazil, the annual incidence reaches 3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Cutaneous lesions in PCM are frequent and ulcer or ulcerous-vegetative lesions are the commonest morphological type, followed by the infiltrative pattern. The histology shows a dermal granulomatous inflammation. Infiltrative PCM can be easily misdiagnosed, once clinical and histological similarities may occur specially with cutaneous sarcoidosis. We describe a case of cutaneous paracoccidioidomycosis misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis both in clinical examination and in the histopathological analysis. Further exams confirmed Paracoccidioides sp. as the causative agent through mycological cultures and Grocott’s stain. We believe this case may help physicians around the world to suspect and consider PCM as a differential diagnosis, especially if the patient has traveled to endemic area or the current therapy for sarcoidosis lacks clinical improvement.

Highlights

  • Case ReportParacoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is the most prevalent systemic mycosis in immunocompetent individuals in Brazil and is caused by the dimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides spp.[1,2,3] In the past, PCM was thought to be caused by P. brasiliensis, but a new species, P. lutzii, was discovered in the central-western region of Brazil.[3]

  • The previous diagnosis of sarcoidosis in our patient was based on infiltrated plaques and histological finding of a dermal granulomatous inflammatory infiltrate without identification of fungi or other microorganisms

  • Clinical and histopathological misdiagnosis may occur due to similarities among cutaneous sarcoidosis, infiltrative PCM and the tuberculoid leprosy.[1]

Read more

Summary

Relato de Caso

Carlos Arthur de Figueiredo Athayde[1], Caroline Cruz Barbosa Nacif[1], Omar Lupi[2], Ricardo Barbosa Lima[1], Marcelo Rosandiski Lyra[3], Antônio Macedo D’Acri[3], Carlos José Martins[1]

Case Report
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call