Abstract

Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice.Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples.Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department.Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI.Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes).Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16% for MSU vs. 23% for FVU with POC culture, 27% vs. 40% with microscopy and 25% vs. 33% with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference.Conclusion/Implication: MSU samples should be used in general practice for optimal accuracy of POC tests. Analysis can be delayed up to four hours.Key pointsPoint-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples.Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests.Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urineThe main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives.

Highlights

  • Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common reason for encounter in general practice and urine samples are handled daily by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice personnel [1]

  • To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice

  • We found that POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more accurate than when performed on firstvoid urine (FVU) at immediate analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common reason for encounter in general practice and urine samples are handled daily by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice personnel [1]. Coli and Enterococci spp. may act as contaminants [2]. Features like high BMI, days since last shower or the degree of intimal hair removal could theoretically contribute to this contamination. Contaminated urine samples may result in diagnostic misclassification, overtreatment, unnecessary side-effects and antibiotic resistance [3,4]. In Denmark, most patients suspected for UTI are instructed to deliver a mid-stream urine (MSU) sample by voiding firstly into the toilet and secondly into the urine container. Practice personnel are trained to analyze the sample shortly after urination by point-of-care (POC) testing, which may include urine dipstick, H.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call