Sampling of Tissues with Laser Ablation for Proteomics: Comparison of Picosecond Infrared Laser and Microsecond Infrared Laser.

Abstract

It was recently shown that sampling of tissues with a picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) for analysis with bottom-up proteomics is advantageous compared to mechanical homogenization. Because the cold ablation of tissues with PIRL irradiation is soft, proteins remain intact and even enzymatic activities are detectable in PIRL homogenates. In contrast, it was observed that irradiation of tissues with a microsecond infrared laser (MIRL) heats the tissue, thereby causing significant damage. In this study, we investigated the question if sampling of tissues with a MIRL for analysis of their proteomes via bottom-up proteomics is possible and how the results are different from sampling of tissues with a PIRL. Comparison of the proteomes of the MIRL and PIRL tissue homogenates showed that the yield of proteins identified by bottom-up proteomics was larger in PIRL homogenates of liver tissue, whereas the yield was higher in MIRL homogenates of muscle tissue, which has a significantly higher content of connective tissue than liver tissue. In the PIRL homogenate of renal tissue, enzymatic activities were detectable, whereas in the corresponding MIRL homogenate, enzymatic activities were absent. In conclusion, MIRL and PIRL pulses are suited for sampling tissues for bottom-up proteomics. If it is important for bottom-up proteomic investigations to inactivate enzymatic activities already in the tissue before its ablation, MIRL tissue sampling is an option, because the proteins in the tissues are denatured and inactivated by the heating of the tissue during irradiation with MIRL irradiation prior to the ablation of the tissue. This heating effect is absent during irradiation of tissue with a PIRL; therefore, sampling of tissues with a PIRL is a choice for purifying enzymes, because their activities are maintained.