Abstract

Objective: At present, Sampling standards and regulations for genetically modified organisms (GMO) are commonly based on theoretical calculations or computer simulations, and there is a lack of field data to validate these simulations. In view of this situation, we sampled agricultural products for GMO content analysis, and investigated the influence of various factors on the accuracy of the results. We have prepared a three-part series and in this part focused on the process from analytical sample to test portions. Method: Using non-transgenic maize as matrix, 12 lines of transgenic maize were used to produce standard analytical samples. After systematic sampling, the GMO contents of these samples were randomly tested, and their single relative standard deviations (RSD) were calculated as a measure of total RSD (single analysis) per sample. Results: By comparing the RSDs of various sampling methods, it was found that the results of 12 strains were basically consistent, and the data of MON810 were listed as a representative. The parameters affecting the standard deviation included the content (aAS), particle size (dAS), test portion mass (MTP) and the number of increments (nIT). Total analytical RSD could be reduced by decreasing particle size, and increasing test portion mass or the number of increments. Based on current laboratory testing conditions and current used kits, for high content analytical sample(>0.01%), more than 2 duplicate test portions with at least -100mesh particle size and 200mg mass were recommended. Conclusion: Based on the results, the recommended values of particle size, test portion mass and the number of increments for the process from analytical sample to test portions were given. These factors were independent on species or strains of the product, so the results were suitable to all species and strains, provided that the solid particles could be crushed to required particle size.

Highlights

  • In the past 30 years, the planting area and yield of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have continuously increased [1], but its impact on human health is still unclear

  • We will make a detailed study on the whole process in a three-part series, and in this part we have focused on the process of the analytical sample to test portion

  • GMO contents in the test portions were tested in a random order by the same DNA exaction kit and the same PCR, one result was obtained on one test portion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the past 30 years, the planting area and yield of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have continuously increased [1], but its impact on human health is still unclear. Many countries are cautious about the effects of GM products, and have adopted strict technical measures for the cultivation, entry and sale of GM products. These restrictions have led to frequent disputes in the international trade of GM products, raising the requirements for GM testing [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Accurate sampling of agricultural products containing GM ingredients has become an important research topic for scientists and technicians [8], and the European Union (EU) [9,10,11,12], ISO [13, 14] and China [15] have formulated regulations for GMO sampling. These regulations rely on theoretical calculations and computer simulations, and analysis using actual data is

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call