Abstract

Sampling experiments were conducted to compare least squares (LS) and weighted least squares (WLS) estimators in heteroscedastic linear regression. Variance estimates obtained both from replicates, si2, and from a modification of Rao's [1970] MINQUE estimator, j2, were used as weighting factors in WLS estimation. Efficiency comparisons of the LS, WLS(s 2), and WLS(g 2) estimators were based on the generalized variance, the Euclidean norm, the variance of the slope estimator, and the variance of the estimator of E(y I x). It was found thatLS estimators are remarkably robust, and only for marked variance heterogeneity or many replicates at each point are weighted estimators uniformly better. In general, unless the number of replicates at each point is large (> 10), WLS (9 2) estimators are more efficient than WLS(s,2).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call