Sampling dried figs for aflatoxin - Part II: effect of sampling plan design on reducing the risk of misclassifying lots

Abstract

Because aflatoxin limits vary widely among regulating countries, the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods (CCCF) began work in 2006 to harmonise maximum levels (MLs) and sampling plans for aflatoxin in dried figs. Studies were developed to measure the variability and distribution among replicated sample aflatoxin test results taken from the same aflatoxin contaminated lot of dried figs so that a model could be developed to evaluate the risk of misclassifying lots of dried figs by aflatoxin sampling plan designs. The model was then be used by the CCCF electronic working group (eWG) to recommend MLs and aflatoxin sampling plan designs to the full CCCF membership for lots traded in the export market. Sixteen 10 kg samples were taken from each of 20 dried fig lots with varying levels of contamination. The observed aflatoxin distribution among the 16-aflatoxin sample test results was compared to the normal, lognormal, compound gamma, and negative binomial distributions. The negative binomial distribution was selected to model aflatoxin distribution among sample test results because it gave acceptable fits to observed aflatoxin distributions among sample test results taken from the same contaminated lot. Using the negative binomial distribution, a computer model was developed to show the effect of the number and size of samples and the accept/reject limits on the chances of rejecting good lots (seller's risk) and accepting bad lots (buyer's risk). The information was shared with the CCCF eWG and in March 2012, the 6th session of CCCF adopted at step 5/8 an aflatoxin sampling plan where three 10 kg samples must all test less than an ML of 10 µg/kg total aflatoxins to accept a dried fig lot. The 35th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission met in July 2012 and adopted the CCCF recommendations for the ML and the sampling plan as an official Codex standard.