Abstract
The accuracy of spatial predictions of rainfall by merging rain-gauge and radar data is partly determined by the sampling design of the rain-gauge network. Optimising the locations of the rain-gauges may increase the accuracy of the predictions. Existing spatial sampling design optimisation methods are based on minimisation of the spatially averaged prediction error variance under the assumption of intrinsic stationarity. Over the past years, substantial progress has been made to deal with non-stationary spatial processes in kriging. Various well-documented geostatistical models relax the assumption of stationarity in the mean, while recent studies show the importance of considering non-stationarity in the variance for environmental processes occurring in complex landscapes. We optimised the sampling locations of rain-gauges using an extension of the Kriging with External Drift (KED) model for prediction of rainfall fields. The model incorporates both non-stationarity in the mean and in the variance, which are modelled as functions of external covariates such as radar imagery, distance to radar station and radar beam blockage. Spatial predictions are made repeatedly over time, each time recalibrating the model. The space-time averaged KED variance was minimised by Spatial Simulated Annealing (SSA). The methodology was tested using a case study predicting daily rainfall in the north of England for a one-year period. Results show that (i) the proposed non-stationary variance model outperforms the stationary variance model, and (ii) a small but significant decrease of the rainfall prediction error variance is obtained with the optimised rain-gauge network. In particular, it pays off to place rain-gauges at locations where the radar imagery is inaccurate, while keeping the distribution over the study area sufficiently uniform.
Highlights
Accurate information about the space-time distribution of rainfall is essential for hydrological modelling
Goudenhoofdt and Delobbe (2009) showed that geostatistical merging methods gave the best results for rainfall prediction in the Walloon region in Belgium, the performance was dependent on the network configuration
Since no standard implementation is available for non-stationary variance kriging, we developed our own code
Summary
Accurate information about the space-time distribution of rainfall is essential for hydrological modelling. Rain-gauge rainfall measurements are generally accurate and have high temporal resolution, but they typically have a low spatial density, which may cause large errors in interpolated maps given the high spatial variability of rainfall. Weather radar imagery provide a full spatial coverage of the rainfall field in combination with high temporal resolution. Radar-derived rainfall predictions experience complex spatio-temporal disturbances and can be inaccurate, especially in mountainous regions. Goudenhoofdt and Delobbe (2009) showed that geostatistical merging methods gave the best results for rainfall prediction in the Walloon region in Belgium, the performance was dependent on the network configuration. For a more detailed review of radar-gauges merging techniques, we refer to Goudenhoofdt and Delobbe (2009), Nanding et al (2015) and Jewell and Gaussiat (2015)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.