Abstract
Sample preservation and storage procedures (acidification with HNO(3) and storage in plastic bottles) normally employed prior to the determination of dissolved Cu in sulfidic waters were compared with sample preservation involving the initial oxidation of sulfide with H(2)O(2) or S(2)O(5)(2-) followed by acidification. Acidification alone was demonstrated to be inadequate and resulted in a significant underestimation of dissolved Cu (losses ranging from 50% to >90%). Similar losses were observed in both polyethylene and Teflon storage bottles. Experiments suggest that losses of copper occur following sample acidification owing to the formation of stable copper sulfide phases which adsorb onto container surfaces. It is therefore recommended that an oxidative pretreatment step is carried out prior to the acidification of porewaters collected for metal analysis. The results of this study suggest that much of the previous data reporting dissolved Cu concentrations in sulfidic waters and porewaters may be in error.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.