Sample representativeness and incidence of liver biopsy complications caused by needles of bigger diameter (1.6 mm) and smaller diameter (1.2 mm) in children with cholestatic syndrome

Abstract

Percutaneous liver biopsy and histomorphological analysis of liver tissue is an important diagnostic procedure in the investigation of neonates and infants with cholestatic syndrome. This study has been aimed at determining whether there is a difference in the incidence of complications after liver biopsy performed by Menghini technique using a needle of 1.6 mm as compared to 1.2 mm diameter and if there is a difference in the sample representativeness of liver tissue after liver biopsy with those two different needle diameters. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 156 neonates and infants with chronic cholestatic syndrome, hospitalized at Mother and Child Health Care Institute, Serbia. One hundred and fifty six children underwent liver biopsy. There was no difference in frequency of liver biopsy complications performed by Menghini technique using a larger diameter needle (1.6 mm) as compared to 1.2 mm diameter. The mortality after liver biopsy was 0% while the frequency of complications with a needle of 1.6 mm in diameter was 3.8% the percentage of serious complications being 0.6%. Among the samples of liver biopsy taken by a larger diameter needle (1.6 mm), 108/109 were representative samples (> 5 portal areas), and among those taken by a smaller diameter needle (1.2 mm), 34/47 were representative samples. Of 109 liver biopsy specimens obtained by Menghini technique using a needle of larger diameter (1.6 mm), 109/109 were representative samples (> 3 portal areas), and when a smaller diameter needle (1.2 mm) was used, 42/47 were representative samples. Our results indicate that the sample representativeness was significantly higher when a larger diameter needle was used for liver biopsy by Menghini technique; however, no difference in the incidence of complications was observed.