Abstract
We investigate the potential for a client to use a same-firm office switch as a mechanism for audit opinion shopping, relying on the framework developed by Lennox (2000). Opinion shopping in this context could either be informationally motivated (Dye 1991) or driven by managerial opportunism. Using U.S. data from 2000-2017, we find that client companies successfully avoid going concern audit opinions through audit office-switch decisions. More importantly, we find that successful office-level opinion shopping is more prevalent among low bankruptcy-risk client companies. We also find that successful opinion-shopping companies tend to choose audit offices with low Type I errors, and they exhibit higher subsequent earnings quality than non-successful counterparts. Overall, the evidence suggests that same-firm audit office switching is not opportunistic, but is primarily informationally motivated and improves audit quality.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
