Abstract

Animal–robot studies can inform us about animal behaviour and inspire advances in agriculture, environmental monitoring and animal health and welfare. Currently, experimental results on how fish are affected by the presence of underwater robots are largely limited to laboratory environments with few individuals and a focus on model species. Laboratory studies provide valuable insight, but their results are not necessarily generalizable to larger scales such as marine aquaculture. This paper examines the effects of underwater robots and a human diver in a large fish aggregation within a Norwegian aquaculture facility, with the explicit purpose to improve the use of underwater robots for fish observations. We observed aquaculture salmon's reaction to the flipper-propelled robot U-CAT in a sea cage with 188 000 individuals. A significant difference in fish behaviour was found using U-CAT when compared to a thruster-driven underwater robot, Argus Mini and a human diver. Specifically, salmon were more likely to swim closer to U-CAT at a lower tailbeat frequency. Fish reactions were not significantly different when considering motor noise or when U-CAT's colour was changed from yellow to silver. No difference was observed in the distance or tailbeat frequency as a response to thruster or flipper motion, when actuated and passively floating robots were compared. These results offer insight into how large aggregations of aquaculture salmon respond to underwater robots. Furthermore, the proposed underwater video processing workflow to assess fish's response to underwater robots is simple and reproducible. This work provides a practical method to study fish–robot interactions, which can lead to improved underwater robot designs to provide more affordable, scalable and effective solutions.

Highlights

  • Animal–robot studies can inform us about animal behaviour and inspire advances in agriculture, environmental monitoring and animal health and welfare

  • The analysis of the tailbeat frequency is presented in figure 6 and reveals that there is a significant difference in tailbeat frequency in the presence of U-CAT and other intruders (Argus Mini and the diver)

  • The mean tailbeat frequency was taken as the dependent variable, and the robot type and actuation mode was evaluated as the independent variable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal–robot studies can inform us about animal behaviour and inspire advances in agriculture, environmental monitoring and animal health and welfare. No difference was observed in the distance or tailbeat frequency as a response to thruster or flipper motion, when actuated and passively floating robots were compared These results offer insight into how large aggregations of aquaculture salmon respond to underwater robots. Notable exceptions are the author’s own study on the response of wild-caught mackerel (3000 individuals) under partially controlled conditions [21], where it was found that fish reacted significantly to the size and speed of a towed fish robot Another outdoor study made use of a remotely operated fish-shaped robot in a coral reef, with the motivation to develop a robot for minimally invasive marine life observation [22]. The study did not include any quantitative or comparative analyses

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call